Despite the matching colors, I was a little disappointed to find the profiles seemed to have less contrast and be slightly warmer in temperature with more red tones than I prefer. I much prefer my Mac's display to have rich, deep colors that really stand out from the display. While the Spyder 3 was able to match colors perfectly, I could not get any setting to result in the rich, deep colors that, oddly, I could get with using a purely software-based calibrator.
This difference may be an inherent trade-off between a profile that results in matching colors versus one that may look more appealing, but to me it indicates two general conclusions from having used both methods of calibrating.
The first is that if you want deeper and richer colors that are likely best for people using one monitor on one computer, then you may be better off taking the time to squint and match colors with a software-based calibration method. The second conclusion is that if you want colors to match between multiple displays which is the main purpose of calibrating in the first place , then you are best off using a device like the Spyder.
The Spyder will not only make profiles that create strikingly similar colors between displays, it will do so very quickly so if you change your work environment, you can get the colors matched up again without much effort. Overall, the Spyder system is a fast calibration utility that can be used to quickly calibrate built-in displays, external displays, and projectors attached to your Mac. Though I have not been able to compare it to other similar hardware calibrators, it does an impressive job at matching colors between devices; however, the results may not be as deep and rich as you might like.
If you are going for richness, then you might try spending time with Apple's built-in calibrator or SuperCal by Berg Design, but if you are in need to have colors between multiple devices be quickly and accurately matched, then the Spyder is the way to go.
Have a fix? Post them below or e-mail us! Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. We delete comments that violate our policy , which we encourage you to read. Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion. Topher Kessler. What is color calibration? Profiling means characterizing how a particular device reproduces colors and a color profile can be used to compensate and effectively calibrate a display by altering color response at the graphics card level.
Both are not mutually exclusive. A factory calibrated display still requires a colorimeter to create a color profile characterizing that particular unit response. This color profile is required by the operating system and color managed apps so they can understand how the hardware, the monitor itself, reproduces color. High-end monitors with true hardware calibration capabilities use custom software and are compatible with specific colorimeter models.
In practice, if you have a display with hardware calibration, make sure to check the updated compatibility lists before purchasing a calibrator. Generally speaking, the i1Display Pro is compatible with all those programs.
As mentioned above, it's a better hardware in terms of low light measurement and I've been using mine for the past 8 years. That difference in price feels smaller when diluted over time or in front of high budget work. True HDR monitors with very high peak brightness require special devices for calibration.
As far as I know, there's only one reasonably priced device on the market capable of calibrating those devices: the recently launched X-Rite i1Display Pro Plus colorimeter.
DisplayCAL is a free display calibration and profiling software that is compatible with most measurement devices on the market. It provides much more advanced and flexible options than the bundled software and can be used in a variety of use cases from the most common calibration targets to complex video 3D LUTs or calibration targets specific for video and color grading.
The possibilities are almost endless. What is cool about DisplayCAL is that it brings advanced features and arguably better quality to devices that are usually differentiated only in software bundle. Speaking specifically about the SpyderX, the only drawback I can see is that using it with DisplayCAL is much slower than with the bundled software.
A full calibration can take 20 minutes, depending on the settings. It's also a more complicated and less user friendly software for less technical users, while the Datacolor bundled software uses a step-by-step wizard that hides complex decisions in the name of ease of use. If you buy a compatible colorimeter or spectrometer and would like to get the most of it, give DisplayCAL it a try. Highly recommended!
DisplayCAL is not as user friendly as the bundled SpyderX software, but it works well with the sensor and offers advanced calibration capabilities and excellent quality for an unbeatable price: free. The Datacolor SpyderX is an excellent device that does its job without much fuss. What more could we ask for? I make a point of only writing about products that I personally use and recommend.
The SpyderX Pro is an easy pick. Updated Jan 01, Cameratico is reader-supported through affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. The Good Fast, easy to use and inexpensive. Well-rounded performance with results that are visually indistinguishable from units costing double its price.
The Bad Extreme low light performance still trails behind the competing products by X-Rite, like the similarly priced i1Display Studio. Hardware design is not upgradeable for future types of display backlight. Do you need to calibrate your monitor? Is this the best monitor calibration tool in ? How good is good enough? Datacolor SpyderX Pro vs. How important are those differences? Very little, for the vast majority of users. Datacolor SpyderX vs. X-Rite i1Display Studio Actual calibration results are pretty much comparable between both display calibrators and I personally can hardly see the difference when switching back and forth between profiles made with each device.
Check hardware settings and warm up Before you begin, the first order of business is to verify all your monitor hardware settings and make sure to select the most appropriate initial state for calibration. Colorimetric devices are made by several manufacturers. But before you rush out and buy the cheapest device you can find, ask yourself these questions. Some photographers will require the features found in more expensive models. I use a Spyder 4 Express to calibrate my monitor.
If you have a different device, the process will be similar. The first screen gives directions. The important points are that you should let your monitor warm up for half an hour before calibration and that there should be no intense light falling on the screen.
It also asks you to reset the contrast setting and set white balance to K. The device will still work. I selected Apple and the display model was filled in automatically. This next step is very important. Gamut is fairly easy. The backlight setting is crucial. I tried that and even I could see with my naked eye that the colour was wrong the screen had a magenta cast.
If your monitor has the model number printed on it, simply Google the model number. Fastest Calibrate your monitor in under two minutes. Most accurate Our new lens-based technology provides a higher level of color accuracy with more precise screen color, shadow detail and white balance.
SpyderX Awards. Discover the latest news in color calibration and explore recent Datacolor press releases and mentions in the media.
0コメント